by Tomàs » Sun Nov 27, 2011 2:45 pm
Possible explanations
- People may have seen a bear and thought it was a Bigfoot.
- People may have believed they have seen a pterosaur but I think they have a lot of imagination.
- A mountaineer may have seen footprints from any ape-like animal and thought it was a Yeti.
What about I believe of cryptoanimals?
- Yeti and Bigfoot are human-like animals. I don’t believe in the first one because there are many different descriptions of it to be credible. On the other hand, I think that high altitudes are a bad place to live this kind of mammals. About the second one, I think is a bit more credible because living in big forest might be a place where it could live without be in sight but I think it is difficult not to see clearly such a large animal.
- Loch Ness Monster I don’t believe it to be existing because I find it difficult to believe that anybody has been able to take any reliable photo of it. I also wonder if this animal is immortal because eyewitnesses are able to see only a specimen at once. The same thing for the Mokele-mbmbe.
- About pterosaurs I think people are sometimes a big nostalgic –nostalgic of adventures, and people have seen lots of films-. How can scape such large flying animals like those to people detection.
- The only one I think is a bit likely to exist is the Tasmanian tiger. It existed actually, so that there might be some hidden specimen in somewhere. But I think, it also would be near to disappear.
I wonder the same question every time: Why is so difficult to see them clearly for everybody that says they have seen each one? Why are they able to see an only specimen at once? These species are not in pursuit by people, so if they are not killed by hunters and they’re so large and strong as they seem (so that they should be dominant species) what is the reason to not reproduce as well as any other kind of animal on Earth?
Possible explanations
- People may have seen a bear and thought it was a Bigfoot.
- People may have believed they have seen a pterosaur but I think they have a lot of imagination.
- A mountaineer may have seen footprints from any ape-like animal and thought it was a Yeti.
What about I believe of cryptoanimals?
- Yeti and Bigfoot are human-like animals. I don’t believe in the first one because there are many different descriptions of it to be credible. On the other hand, I think that high altitudes are a bad place to live this kind of mammals. About the second one, I think is a bit more credible because living in big forest might be a place where it could live without be in sight but I think it is difficult not to see clearly such a large animal.
- Loch Ness Monster I don’t believe it to be existing because I find it difficult to believe that anybody has been able to take any reliable photo of it. I also wonder if this animal is immortal because eyewitnesses are able to see only a specimen at once. The same thing for the Mokele-mbmbe.
- About pterosaurs I think people are sometimes a big nostalgic –nostalgic of adventures, and people have seen lots of films-. How can scape such large flying animals like those to people detection.
- The only one I think is a bit likely to exist is the Tasmanian tiger. It existed actually, so that there might be some hidden specimen in somewhere. But I think, it also would be near to disappear.
I wonder the same question every time: Why is so difficult to see them clearly for everybody that says they have seen each one? Why are they able to see an only specimen at once? These species are not in pursuit by people, so if they are not killed by hunters and they’re so large and strong as they seem (so that they should be dominant species) what is the reason to not reproduce as well as any other kind of animal on Earth?
