Forums

Thank you!

Thanks for your opinion Javier! As for me, I am a little bit sceptical about the existence of these creatures.. :)
Can I help with something?
One could try a bear = This is not possible. You can say: It could be a bear or a...
on a lake is very difficult for such a large creature lived without being hardly seen = You can say: It is not probable that such a big creature could live in a lake without being seen.
but has not found any evidence = Word order: But no evidence has been found...
See you!
Pieter

Yeti: In my opinion the yeti is a fairly believable creature that lives in a fairly uninhabited and inhospitable area. One could try a bear or great ape because there is no real evidence of their existence , there are only stories and footprints attributed to this creature.

Loch Ness Monster: For me the Loch Ness Monster is little credible on a lake is very difficult for such a large creature lived without being hardly seen . Probably people saw a big fish or other animal and certainly no longer a legend.

Bigfoot: I think much the same of Bigfoot Yeti

Mokele-mbembe: For me this creature could exist , but has not found any evidence apart from the stories of African tribes.

Pterosaur: I think much the same of Mokele-mbembe