by Anna » Wed Apr 19, 2017 9:58 am
To be quite honest, I’m not very familiar or apprised with modern art. I must say that I’m not even interested in it. But I reckon it’s a form of expression that seeks new ways to awaken people up from their conformism with established rules of aesthetics. Anyway, it seems quite exciting to participate on creating a piece of art, especially for children, although I wouldn’t qualify “Obliteration Room” as a piece of art…rather an experiment with people’s behaviour. I wouldn’t take the result seriously; I’d dare to say that the artist doesn’t pretend so, either.
Art in public places obviously helps that people approach to it, because when one eases its access making it handier and closest, one eliminates the barriers of exclusivity that long has existed. It is one thing to make art more accessible to people, and another thing is to pretend that everyone is capable of creating something reasonably serious, unless we talk about children. In this case, it just comes down to having fun. This is the only case in which I think that art for the general public is useful. Children are free of prejudices and clichés, as If they were a white canvas where coloured dots can be stuck or paint tubes can be smeared. I remember a lot of very happy moments going to the museums with my son and some of his friends and becoming anonymous artists, but the best of all is that he himself still remembers them.
To be quite honest, I’m not very familiar or apprised with modern art. I must say that I’m not even interested in it. But I reckon it’s a form of expression that seeks new ways to awaken people up from their conformism with established rules of aesthetics. Anyway, it seems quite exciting to participate on creating a piece of art, especially for children, although I wouldn’t qualify “Obliteration Room” as a piece of art…rather an experiment with people’s behaviour. I wouldn’t take the result seriously; I’d dare to say that the artist doesn’t pretend so, either.
Art in public places obviously helps that people approach to it, because when one eases its access making it handier and closest, one eliminates the barriers of exclusivity that long has existed. It is one thing to make art more accessible to people, and another thing is to pretend that everyone is capable of creating something reasonably serious, unless we talk about children. In this case, it just comes down to having fun. This is the only case in which I think that art for the general public is useful. Children are free of prejudices and clichés, as If they were a white canvas where coloured dots can be stuck or paint tubes can be smeared. I remember a lot of very happy moments going to the museums with my son and some of his friends and becoming anonymous artists, but the best of all is that he himself still remembers them.